Roy Moore Scares the S___ Out of Me

Crossposted from Moral Questions Weblog.

This month's Atlantic had a feature by Washington Monthly writer Joshua Green focused on the growing influence within radical christian right circles of former Alabama supreme court chief justice Roy Moore.  While it is chiefly a fine profile of a rising Republican demegogue, it is at the same time a startling example of the political extremism that now rules the Evangelical wing of Christianity in America, a fanaticism that--and I use this equivilence consiously--is freighteningly similar to the Nazi party in its absolutism and irrationality, though lacking its potential for mass popularity.

Growing up in an Evangelical family, its sometimes hard to convey just how twisted and fanatical the Evangelical culture has become.  Green catchs some priceless moments during some of the talks Moore gives his christian supporters.  I've reprinted two of them:

The large crowd at the Southern Baptists' conference seemed to feed Moore's sense of ceremony, upping the historical-utterance quotient. As all his speeches tend to do, this one alternated between declaiming his legal-historical views and lamenting his ouster as chief justice--an event that has become the central focus of his life. In the middle of his speech Moore paused and turned to a JumboTron high overhead. The lights dimmed, and the audience was shown a videotape of Judge William Thompson reading the verdict that kicked Moore off the court in the ethics case stemming from his refusal to remove the Ten Commandments monument. When it ended, Moore told the audience, "I believe that video was given by God."

The reminder of this public slight seemed to ignite his passion. He went into an attack on his ideological opponents, his voice rising in anger. "Separation of church and state does not mean separation of God and government!" he said, and was stopped by applause. As Moore continued, his face became stern and then angry, and his voice was a roar. "'Be ye horribly afraid,'" he thundered, quoting from the second chapter of Jeremiah, "'for my people have committed two evils: they have forsaken Me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.' Our schools, our political institutions, are not holding water today, because we've tried to construct them without God! We've been deceived by a government that tells us we cannot worship God--contradictory to history, contradictory to law, and contradictory to logic. And we bow down. Shall we bow down?" Cries of "No!" cascaded from the rafters.

Then Moore downshifted, his voice growing solemn once more, and he demonstrated another rhetorical flourish common to the Founding Fathers: he shared his poetry.

"We're fighting wars all over this globe, it sometimes seems," he said. "We're fighting one in Iraq today." A beatific smile came over his face.

"And we face another war

Fought not upon some distant shore,

Nor against a foe that you can see,

But one as ruthless as can be.

It will take your life and your children too,

And say there's nothing you can do.

It will make you think that wrong is right,

Is but a sign to stand and fight.

And though we face the wrath of Hell,

Against those gates we shall prevail.

In homes in schools across our land,

It's time for Christians to take a stand,

And when our work on this earth is done,

And the battle is over and the victory is won,

When through all the earth His praise will ring,

And all the heavenly angels sing,

It will be enough just to see His son,

And hear him say 'My child, well done.

'You've kept my faith so strong and true,

'I knew that I could count on you.'"

As he finished, the crowd rose to its feet and broke into a chorus of "God Bless America."

Later that evening Moore was the keynote speaker at the annual conference of the Pacific Justice Institute, a conservative judicial group in California that is active in Christian circles. It was here, among his fellow seekers of a return to a constitutional utopia, that Moore gave the clearest glimpse of how he views himself and his crusade.

Before a room of 500 people Moore launched into the usual description of how he'd been railroaded by the federal courts. But then he stopped and announced that he'd brought something special. He turned to the giant video screen behind him and told the audience that he was going to show them his cross-examination by Bill Pryor, then the state attorney general, in the Ten Commandments case.

Cameras had been barred from the proceedings, Moore explained in a voice of deepest solemnity, but someone had sneaked in and recorded them anyway. Judging from the angle of the shot, the cameraman had hidden high above the courtroom floor. Moore had somehow managed to get hold of a bootleg tape and had extracted the scene of his cross-examination. He had superimposed the grainy video of his testimony on an American flag, fluttering in slow motion, and scored the scene with soaring orchestral music:

PRYOR: And your understanding is that the federal court ordered that you could not acknowledge God; isn't that right?

MOORE: Yes.

PRYOR: And if you resume your duties as chief justice after this proceeding, you will continue to acknowledge God as you have testified that you would today?

MOORE: That's right.

PRYOR: No matter what any other official says?

MOORE: Absolutely. Without--let me clarify that. Without an acknowledgment of God, I cannot do my duties. I must acknowledge God. It says so in the constitution of Alabama. It says so in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. It says so in everything I have read.

PRYOR: The only point I am trying to clarify, Mr. Chief Justice, is not why, but only that in fact, if you do resume your duties as chief justice, you will continue to do that without regard to what any other official says. Isn't that right?

MOORE: ... I think you must.

When the lights came up, Moore was standing at attention with his hand over his heart, tears shining in his eyes. The audience roared.

Reading the article, I couldn't help being fascinated by how silly the Christian Right's idea of history is and had to really wonder just what it is they truly fear.  Do they genuinely believe--and I know for a fact that some do--that if America extends equality under the law to gays or begins to shift from a geopolitical position that fails to follow Isreali foreign policy, the continent will be swallowed up by a series of natural disasters?  Do they really believe that America circa 1950 was really some Eden of morality?  

Or is there something far more subtle going on here?  Is what's really happening here nothing more than a new version of a very old story, told and retold throughout human history, which has its roots in the end in simple hatred and intolerence: an all too familiar, but much less talked about history of how American Conservatism has dealt with those who weren't like its members.  

The rapant gaybaiting that goes on in the conservative movement has a ring all too familiar of the "victorious German culture" the Nazis once spoke of.  It is becoming a pathetic sister to the totalitarian movements of the past century, and, sadly, it is tearing the American political discourse apart.


Display:


Evangelical? (none / 0)

Or is there something far more subtle going on here?  Is what's really happening here nothing more than a new version of a very old story, told and retold throughout human history, which has its roots in the end in simple hatred and intolerance: an all too familiar, but much less talked about history of how American Conservatism has dealt with those who weren't like its members.

Absolutely there is something far more subtle going on here. But first, growing up evangelical, you should know these people are NOT evangelical, and not all of them can truly claim to be Christians. This is not about God; it is about the "Leave it to Beaver" America they wish would come back. The fact it never really existed doesn't seem to matter. You don't have to go as far back as pre-WWII Germany, check out 1960s U.S.A. Men like Roy Moore would have led lynching. He and men like Pat Robertson or Tony Perkins could have been George Wallace. The only African Americans allowed in their clique are ones who will tow the line. The "good Reverend" Phelps is someone who probably has homosexual tendencies and hates himself more than anyone else. Growing up in a Christian home, I know you have probably read the words of Christ, and these people in no way reflects any of his love or his courage. He himself hung out with people the before mentioned men would drive over in a pick up. You are right to fell these people are dangerous. Like so many before them, they use God to their own ends to push their own agenda that has very little to do with the living word of God. Billy Graham is an evangelical, these people are worse than Pharisees. They have chosen gays because of the general ignorance of the average person. Homosexuals are easy to pick on. Mark my words, if they solidify their growing power, if republicans continue down the path of catering to fanatics every bit as dangerous as any Muslim extremist, gay are only the being. Next it will be brown immigrates, then blacks, then Catholics, then anyone who isn't their idea of a true "American."

Ku Klux
by Langston Hughes

They took me out
To some lonesome place.
They said, "Do you believe
In the great white race?"

I said, "Mister,
To tell you the truth,
I'd believe in anything
If you'd just turn me loose."

The white man said, "Boy,
Can it be
You're a-standin' there
A-sassin' me?"

They hit me in the head
And knocked me down.
And then they kicked me
On the ground.

A klansman said, "Nigger,
Look me in the face--
And tell me you believe in
The great white race."

by AmericanWomanPatriot on Mon Sep 19, 2005 at 08:10:47 PM EST

Moore and Wallace (none / 0)

Is Roy Moore the next George Wallace? Or is Moore more dangerous?

For all of his rhetoric, Wallace was all show for the people of Alabama. After losing the 1958 gubernatorial election when Wallace was endorsed by the NAACP and his opponent was favored by the KKK, Wallace vowed that he'd "never be outniggered again", and continued his career as a strident segregationalist.

Wallace viewed his segregationalist views as a means to an end, the end being his own political power. While he was making his speech at the door of the University of Alabama, he made sure there would be no rioting like there was at Ole' Miss.

Wallace eventually rejected segregation. Whether it was a bullet, Jesus, or the Voting Rights Act that did it can be debated.

As for Roy Moore, he seems to be another self-promoting demagogue like Wallace. However, his followers are what worry me.

by wayward on Mon Sep 19, 2005 at 09:17:15 PM EST

Re: Moore and Wallace (none / 0)

While Wallace may have used rhetoric as a means to an end, he still enflamed the very worst in people that would wait until dark to do their deeds. He was a hero not only to people in his own state, but here in Florida people loved him because of his "nigger baiting." My grandmother still talks of people who disappeared only to have their dead bodies found in rural Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia. Rhetoric can kill. That is why I feel there is little difference between a David Duke, Roy Moore, Pat Robertson, etc., etc., are all dangerous people, and if they are Christian, I can't see it.
by AmericanWomanPatriot on Mon Sep 19, 2005 at 09:48:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This gives a great opportunity to us. (none / 0)

To have a 2008 Democratic Presidential cannidate get up at an NRA convention and show a tape of the one of these really nutty religious people and say and "Folks like that are why I'll never let the right to bear arms go away and why I keep a 50. cal next to my bed in case they ever do try and take away my freedom!
by strrbr on Mon Sep 19, 2005 at 11:27:48 PM EST

Re: This gives a great opportunity to us. (none / 0)

That's a very good way to seperate the Republican Party from the NRA actually. Republicans  cannot survive without the so-called Religious Right so they can't allow them to be threatened and the NRA wants guns for all. Tweek it, confuse the issue a little and voila-the NRA is without a political party. Far fetched? Karl Rove has done more with less.
by AmericanWomanPatriot on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 12:05:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.